What fossils teach us about design
Designers are, by nature, problem solvers. But what happens when we define the wrong problem from the start? That’s the quiet trap many UX teams fall into. We become so locked into our assumptions that we fail to notice the real opportunities sitting right in front of us.
There’s an unlikely but powerful story from paleontology that illustrates this: the case of the Essexella fossil. For decades, scientists believed it was a jellyfish. It wasn’t. And the reason they got it wrong has everything to do with perspective a concept every UX designer should internalize.
The Fossil That Fooled Scientists
Essexella fossils are abundant in the Mazon Creek region of Illinois. For more than 50 years, they were labeled as jellyfish because they looked like jellyfish. But something never added up. These fossils appeared in places jellyfish shouldn't have been. Their shape didn’t align with typical jellyfish anatomy. Still, the assumption stuck.
One turn of the fossil changed everything.
And just like that, we have a metaphor that applies directly to UX When we hold on too tightly to our first assumption, we risk misinterpreting the entire design problem.
You Are Not Your User
This might be the most fundamental truth in UX and yet it's so easy to forget. Designers, developers, and product managers bring their own experiences to the table. But those experiences are not universal. We design for people who think differently, act differently, and move through the world differently than we do.
Like the scientists who saw a jellyfish because they expected to see a jellyfish, we sometimes design features or flows because we assume we know what the user wants. We filter user behavior through the lens of our own understanding.